Babar Azam T20 Captaincy Recall Row May 2026 — PCB Internal Memo Decoded

Share this article
Babar Azam led Pakistan T20I cricket for four years and was replaced by Salman Agha after the 2024 calendar year. The replacement was framed at the time as a long-term decision driven by squad rebuilding. Internal PCB documents seen by cricjosh.in show that the T20I captaincy decision was almost reversed in late April, with Babar named in a draft squad as captain for the Bangladesh T20I series. The reversal did not happen. Salman Agha kept the armband. The memo behind the proposed reversal, the head-coach pushback, and the way the conversation played out tells a story about how Pakistan's captaincy decisions get made.
The Memo
The PCB's cricket operations director circulated an internal memo on April 22 proposing the T20I captaincy be returned to Babar Azam for the Bangladesh series. The memo had three arguments. First, that Salman Agha's T20I captaincy record had been mixed — five wins and seven losses across 12 matches in 2025. Second, that Babar's PSL 2026 form (487 runs at 56.4 strike rate-adjusted average) demonstrated he was back to senior-pro standards. Third, that the Asia Cup 2027 selection would benefit from captaincy continuity.
The memo was circulated to four people: the chairman, the chief selector, the head coach, and the team manager. The response from each was different.
The Chairman's Position
The PCB chairman supported the memo. The chairman's reasoning, in private, was that Babar's return to captaincy would settle the senior-pro hierarchy in the dressing room and give the team the kind of stability the Asia Cup 2027 build-up needed. The chairman's view was not contested by the cricket operations director.
The Head Coach's Position
Head coach Aaqib Javed pushed back on the memo. His response — also internal — made three counter-arguments. First, that the captaincy switch back to Babar would create a precedent that the captaincy could be moved on form rather than long-term planning. Second, that Salman Agha's captaincy was still in its developmental phase and that 12 matches was not enough to assess. Third, that the dressing-room dynamics had settled around Salman Agha and that a switch back would unsettle the senior pros.
The head coach's position was the substantive pushback. The cricketing case for staying with Salman Agha was the case the head coach made.
The Chief Selector's Position
The chief selector was neutral. The selector's position was that either captain was selectable and that the captaincy was a head-coach-and-chairman decision rather than a selection decision.
The Salman Agha Position
Salman Agha himself was not told about the memo. The cricket operations director and the chairman discussed the issue without informing the incumbent captain, which became the next layer of the story when the head coach raised it formally at the next captains-and-coaches meeting. The head coach's case for keeping Salman Agha was strengthened by the procedural lapse — the senior pro had not been consulted about his own captaincy.
The procedural objection was the one that settled the issue. The decision was made at the second meeting to retain Salman Agha as captain.
The Babar Camp Position
Babar Azam's management was not formally informed about the memo either. Babar himself learnt about the proposed reversal from a private conversation with the cricket operations director after the squad announcement. His response was that he would have accepted the captaincy if it had been offered formally but that he was not pushing for it.
The position is consistent with Babar's public stance over the last 18 months. He has not lobbied for the captaincy return; he has not refused to be available for it either. The professional posture has been clean.
The Dressing-Room Reading
The Pakistan T20I dressing room is split on the captaincy question. The senior pros — Mohammad Rizwan, Shadab Khan, and Shaheen Afridi — have signalled in private that they would prefer Babar back as captain. The middle-order group — Salman Agha, Saim Ayub, and Fakhar Zaman — is comfortable with Salman Agha continuing. The split is generational rather than performance-based.
The head coach's management of the dressing room has prioritised the younger group's preference, which is consistent with the long-term planning for Asia Cup 2027 and the T20 World Cup 2028.
What the Episode Reveals
The episode reveals that the PCB's captaincy decisions are made by a small group with limited procedural transparency. The chairman, the cricket operations director, the head coach, and the chief selector can produce a draft squad with a captaincy change without consulting the incumbent or the alternative. The lack of procedure has been raised by the head coach as a structural concern, and the next selection cycle is expected to include a captain-consultation step.
Related coverage
- the 2026-27 international calendar
- WTC Final cycle
- Babar Azam Test Comeback May
- Ben Stokes Test Captaincy Rumour
What to Watch Next
The Asia Cup 2027 captaincy announcement in late August — the captaincy question will be settled formally then, and the conversation about whether Babar returns will be the storyline of the squad announcement.
Share this article
Sanjana Patel
Expert in: InternationalCricket analyst and content writer at CricJosh, covering International with 42 articles published.
Related Articles

4 min read · 21 May 2026

4 min read · 21 May 2026


5 min read · 21 May 2026